Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Spondylolisthesis means one vertebra has slipped forward on the one below it. The most common level is L4 on L5, right at the base of the lower back. When a vertebra slips forward, it narrows the spinal canal and pinches the nerve roots — so treating spondylolisthesis means treating two problems at once: the nerve compression, and the instability from the slip itself.

At a Glance

Spondylolisthesis means one vertebra has slipped forward on the one below it, most commonly at L4-L5
It causes a mix of lower back pain, leg pain, and classic inability to stand or walk for long without sitting down
Many patients get significant relief from physical therapy, weight loss, and targeted injections
When surgery is needed, options range from simple decompression to minimally invasive fusion with robotically placed screws
Large randomized trials disagree about whether fusion is necessary — which is why the right surgeon and the right judgment matter

Symptoms

Diagnosis

Standing X-rays (Flexion-Extension)

A slip that changes more than 3 mm between positions is considered unstable and affects treatment decisions. An MRI lying flat can miss or under-estimate the slip.

MRI

Shows the soft tissues, spinal canal, and nerve roots. Tells us where the stenosis is and how severe the compression is.

CT Scan

Best for bone detail; especially useful for surgical planning when fusion and screw placement are being considered.

Types

By Cause

Degenerative — most common in adults; facet joints and discs wear down over years
Isthmic — caused by a stress fracture in the pars interarticularis; usually happens in adolescence; most common at L5-S1
Traumatic — caused by a high-energy injury
Pathologic — caused by a tumor or infection weakening the bone
Congenital — present from birth

By Severity: Meyerding Grade

Grade I — up to 25% slip (most degenerative cases)
Grade II — 25–50% slip
Grade III — 50–75% slip
Grade IV — 75–100% slip
Grade V (spondyloptosis) — completely slipped off

Treatment

Conservative Care

Most patients never need surgery. Conservative options include:

Physical therapy focused on core stabilization, hip flexibility, and posture
Weight loss when relevant
NSAIDs and short courses of other pain medications
Epidural steroid injections for leg pain not settling

If still limited after at least 8–12 weeks of non-operative care, surgery enters the conversation.

Decompression Alone (Laminectomy)

Removes the back portion of the spine that's pressing on the nerves. Advantages: shorter operation, less blood loss, faster recovery, no hardware. Disadvantage: risk of slip progression over time requiring another operation.

Decompression With Fusion

Decompresses the nerves and stabilizes the segment with screws, rods, and usually an interbody cage. Stops the slip from progressing. Trade-off: longer operation, longer recovery.

The Big Debate: To Fuse or Not to Fuse?

SLIP trial (Ghogawala 2016): fusion produced better quality-of-life scores and cut reoperation rate roughly in half (14% vs 34% at 4 years). Swedish trial and NORDSTEN-DS (2021): decompression alone non-inferior to fusion at 2–5 years. Bottom line: the right operation depends on the individual, and experienced judgment matters.

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Approaches

MIS-TLIF places the interbody cage and pedicle screws through small tubular retractors. Published 5-year outcomes show equivalent long-term results to open TLIF with less blood loss and shorter hospital stays. Robotic navigation places screws with millimeter accuracy.

Outcomes

Trial	Comparison	Follow-up	Key Result
SPORT (8-yr f/u 2018)	Surgery vs. non-operative	8 years	Surgery remained significantly better for pain and function
SLIP (Ghogawala 2016)	Laminectomy + fusion vs. alone	4 years	Fusion: better SF-36, reoperation 14% vs. 34%
Försth / Swedish (2016)	Decompression + fusion vs. alone	2 and 5 years	No clinical difference; higher cost with fusion
NORDSTEN-DS (Austevoll 2021)	Decompression alone vs. with fusion	2 years	Decompression alone non-inferior; reoperation slightly higher

References

Ghogawala Z, et al. Laminectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. NEJM. 2016;374(15):1424-1434. PMID: 27074067
Försth P, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. NEJM. 2016;374(15):1413-1423. PMID: 27074066
Austevoll IM, et al. Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (NORDSTEN-DS). NEJM. 2021;385(6):526-538. PMID: 34347953
Weinstein JN, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (SPORT). NEJM. 2007;356(22):2257-2270. PMID: 17538085
Chan AK, et al. MIS versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus. 2023;54(1):E2. PMID: 36587409

Our Specialists

Mohamad Bydon, MD

Neurosurgery

Timothy Witham, MD

Neurosurgery

Martin Herman, MD, PhD

Neurosurgery

Request an Appointment

We are currently experiencing a high volume of inquiries, leading to delayed response times. For faster assistance, please call 1-773-702-2123 to schedule your appointment.

If you have symptoms of an urgent nature, please call your doctor or go to the emergency room immediately.

By submitting this form you acknowledge the risk of sending this information by email and agree not to hold the University of Chicago or University of Chicago Medical Center liable for any damages you may incur as a result of the transfer or use of this information. The use or transmittal of this form does not create a physician-contact relationship. More information regarding the confidentiality of this request can be found in our Privacy Policy.

* Indicates required field