PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine whether binimetinib and mFOLFOX6 combination therapy improves overall
survival (OS) compared to mFOLFOX6 alone in patients with advanced/recurrent biliary
tract cancer (BTC) and with alterations in RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, who have progressed
on one prior line of therapy.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine whether binimetinib and mFOLFOX6 combination therapy improves objective
response rate (ORR) compared to FOLFOX alone.
II. To determine if clinical outcomes including progression free survival (PFS), duration
of response (DOR), and disease control rate (DCR) are improved with combination treatment
of binimetinib and mFOLFOX6 compared to FOLFOX alone in patients with advanced/recurrent
BTC and with alterations in RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway who have progression on one prior
line of therapy.
III. Toxicity and tolerability will be evaluated within and between the two treatment
arms, where frequency, type, and severity of adverse events will be assessed per the
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE)
version (v)5.0.
IV. Collect tissue and provide it to the ComboMATCH Registration Protocol to assess
concordance between the diagnostic tumor mutation profile generated by the Designated
Laboratories, the pre-treatment biopsy mutation profile, and the pre-treatment
circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) mutation profile from plasma, as
described in ComboMATCH Registration Protocol.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. Generate a prognostic model of MAPK mutations for this patient population using
clinical, laboratory and molecular features of their disease and clinical outcome to
validate on future samples.
II. Correlation of outcome with albumin. III. Assess the correlation between the presence
of MAPK pathway mutations and activity of addition of binimetinib therapy to standard 2nd
line chemotherapy.
IV. Conduct whole-exome sequencing and ribonucleic acid (RNA)-sequencing at baseline, and
on optional biopsy upon progression to assess determinants of response and resistance.
V. Explore changes in plasma MAPK mutations allelic burden and other molecular findings
at baseline and upon progression using ctDNA and correlate changes with clinical
activity, disease course as well as response/resistance to therapy.
VI. Evaluate if our machine learning algorithm for RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway mutations
correlates with detection of mutations as well as prediction of outcomes from samples
obtained in this study.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM 1: Patients receive leucovorin intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on day 1,
oxaliplatin IV over 30 minutes on day 1, and fluorouracil IV over 46-48 hours on days
1-2. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable
toxicity. Patients undergo echocardiogram (ECHO) and multigated acquisition scan (MUGA)
during screening and on study, a computed tomography (CT) with contrast, magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI), or a fludeoxyglucose F-18 positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)
during screening, collection of blood during screening and on study, and a biopsy during
screening. Patients may also undergo brain MRI or CT during screening and on study, bone
scans on study, and biopsy on study if clinically indicated.
ARM 2: Patients receive binimetinib orally (PO) on days 1-14, and leucovorin IV,
oxaliplatin IV, and fluorouracil IV as in Arm 1. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the
absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo ECHO and MUGA
during screening and on study, a CT with contrast, MRI, or an FDG-PET during screening,
collection of blood during screening and on study, and a biopsy during screening.
Patients may also undergo brain MRI or CT during screening and on study, bone scans on
study, and biopsy on study if clinically indicated.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 8 weeks until disease
progression, thereafter patients are followed for survival every 4 months for up to 5
years following registration.