OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with favorable-risk stage II
prostate cancer treated with hypofractionated vs conventionally fractionated
three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated
radiotherapy (IMRT).
Secondary
- Compare time to local progression, freedom from biochemical recurrence, and
disease-specific and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the incidence of gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxic effects in
patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the degree, duration, and significant differences in disease-specific
health-related quality of life (HRQOL) decrements, using the Expanded Prostate
Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), in patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine whether anxiety and/or depression, as measured by the Hopkins Symptom
Checklist-25 (HSCL-25), are decreased with therapy that improves DFS of these
patients .
- Determine whether the incremental gain in DFS outweighs decrements in the generic
domains of HRQOL (i.e., mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and
anxiety/depression) in patients treated with these regimens.
- Conduct a cost-utility analysis of hypofractionated 3D-CRT or IMRT as a prostate
cancer therapy if this regimen is shown to be as effective as conventionally
fractionated 3D-CRT or IMRT in improving DFS.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified
according to Gleason score (2-4 vs 5-6), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (< 4 ng/mL
vs 4-<9 ng/mL), and planned radiotherapy modality (three-dimensional conformal
radiotherapy [3D-CRT] vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT]). Patients are
randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo conventionally fractionated 3D-CRT or IMRT once daily 5 days
a week for 8.2 weeks (total of 41 treatments).
- Arm II: Patients undergo hypofractionated 3D-CRT or IMRT once daily 5 days a week
for 5.6 weeks (total of 28 treatments).
Quality of life, anxiety, and depression are assessed at baseline and then at 6 months
and 1, 2, and 5 years after the start of radiotherapy.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years,
every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,067 patients will be accrued to this study.